The Green Man Is Really Green

We elected Democrats because we wanted grownups in charge for a change. between being fucking retarded and wanting to get rid of the pentagon, I don't see the grownups.

From supporting the conservadems and lots of concessions all going to the right. I don't feel its right for him to be belittling the base for all they themselves do wrong.

I believe he is under the infulence of the beltway crowd who for years to explain Bush's two terms that country was center right. Then they explained the democratic win of the white house as the country moved to the center right.

The white house needs to stop whining, buck up and list their accomplishments. Tell us what they are going to do and just do it. And stop playing politics when you don't have to.

Does This Message make My Butt Look Crazy

I was one of the lucky people who got sent this on YouTube.

KamikazeKoscki

gun control

gun control

"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." - Samuel Adams



Norman Thomas, in his book What Is Our Destiny? (1944)

"The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism, but under the name of Liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day American will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened.

Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist party.
[Two Worlds, Flick-Reedy Education Enterprises, Bensenville, IL 1966, p 90 & 152]

Question....what is the status of this bill or treaty....??


Subject: Obama Finds Legal Way Around The 2nd Amendment dtd 3/25/2010

If This Passes, There Will Be WAR and this is what they had anticipated long ago. Just got this...pass it far & wide.




On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a Plan to Ban All Firearms in the US 
On Wednesday Obama took first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the US. The Obama admin intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama admin can use the US State Dept to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Govt signs these intl treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign govts. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the UN and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms. 

The Obama admin is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened. Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the US, ha-ha) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Sec of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to intl treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one day and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local govt collection and destruction center or face imprisonment.

As sure as govt health care will be forced on us by the Obama admin through whatever means necessary, so will gun control. 

Read the Article

U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The US reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto.

The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Dept, overturns the position of former Pres G W. Bush's admin, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better. View The Full Article Here



Please forward this message to others who may be concerned about the direction in which our country is headed. This is a very serious matter! 




Silence will lead us to Socialism!!! Apparently national controls as supported by the Bush Admin. didn't work so now they are going international. FOLKS, there are over 2 million UN Troops inside the US preparing to execute confiscation of weapons when the signal is given.



U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade
Wed, Oct 14 2009
By Arshad Mohammed

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto.

The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the United States would support the talks as long as the negotiating forum, the so-called Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty, "operates under the rules of consensus decision-making."

"Consensus is needed to ensure the widest possible support for the Treaty and to avoid loopholes in the Treaty that can be exploited by those wishing to export arms irresponsibly," Clinton said in a written statement.

While praising the Obama administration's decision to overturn the Bush-era policy and to proceed with negotiations to regulate conventional arms sales, some groups criticized the U.S. insistence that decisions on the treaty be unanimous.

"The shift in position by the world's biggest arms exporter is a major breakthrough in launching formal negotiations at the United Nations in order to prevent irresponsible arms transfers," Amnesty International and Oxfam International said in a joint statement.

However, they said insisting that decisions on the treaty be made by consensus "could fatally weaken a final deal."

"Governments must resist US demands to give any single state the power to veto the treaty as this could hold the process hostage during the course of negotiations. We call on all governments to reject such a veto clause," said Oxfam International's policy adviser Debbie Hillier.

The proposed legally binding treaty would tighten regulation of, and set international standards for, the import, export and transfer of conventional weapons.

Supporters say it would give worldwide coverage to close gaps in existing regional and national arms export control systems that allow weapons to pass onto the illicit market.

Nations would remain in charge of their arms export control arrangements but would be legally obliged to assess each export against criteria agreed under the treaty. Governments would have to authorize transfers in writing and in advance.

The main opponent of the treaty in the past was the U.S. Bush administration, which said national controls were better. Last year, the United States accounted for more than two-thirds of some $55.2 billion in global arms transfer deals.

Arms exporters China, Russia and Israel abstained last year in a U.N. vote on the issue.

The proposed treaty is opposed by conservative U.S. think tanks like the Heritage Foundation, which said last month that it would not restrict the access of "dictators and terrorists" to arms but would be used to reduce the ability of democracies such as Israel to defend their people.

The U.S. lobbying group the National Rifle Association has also opposed the treaty.

A resolution before the U.N. General Assembly is sponsored by seven nations including major arms exporter Britain. It calls for preparatory meetings in 2010 and 2011 for a conference to negotiate a treaty in 2012.

(Editing by Eric Beech)

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q920091015


TEA PARTIES: You are being set up for failure. Tea Parties formed by Counsel for National Policy, under the CFR, and the CFR is under the Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA) a part of the Roundtable controlled by the Committee of the 300, Illuminati/World Government Agenda. You people better WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! damn it.....


Alex Jones (Pro-Jesuit/CIA trained and Zionist shill), Ron Paul (member of the Masons and secret societies), Naomi Wolf (Rhodes Scholar), [Jordan Maxwell, Ickes, Tsarion, Woodcock, Rense; they are part of a "Fifth Column Strategy" to tell truth but mislead in subtle ways or actually fuel the need to revolt with force, or play the game I'm on your side, voice the issues but do NOTHING ABOUT it but give lip service like Ron Paul and Alex Jones. Michael Moore is or was, managed by Ari Emanuel, brother of Obama's Chief of Staff,

Rahm Emanuel who is the White House Chief of Staff. Prior to joining President Barack H. Obama's administration, Emanuel served in the House of Representatives, representing the fifth district of Illinois, and was Chairman of the House Democratic Caucus. As an advocate for Chicago's working families, Emanuel served on the House Ways and Means Committee, which oversees taxes, trade, Social Security, and Medicare issues.

Appointed by then House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, Emanuel served as Chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee for the 2006 cycle. Under his leadership, Democrats gained 30 seats in the House without losing a single incumbent, and ushered in a new Democratic majority for the first time in more than a decade.

Back to the article, you will find the Heritage Foundation [in the article], is part of Travistock [formed 1921 who also educated and trained Hitler after WWI. Travistock also designed our "1960's culture change" during study in the 1950's. This was first accomplished by integrating Rock and Roll using the Beetles as the beginning of a very carefully planned set of criteria and an agenda that would result in major social change in our culture, using drugs brought into the country by CIA contractors [via South American, Mexico and later Vietnam], specific terminology [peace sign, slang, occult signs and symbols, bringing in quietly the New Age Concepts for permanent adaptation; the Elvis shock was a design set by them, fact. Then afterwards there was a flurry of International Rock Stars set as a strategy in order to continue the renovation and eventual destruction of our culture from the inside. The Feminist movement was in FACT, financed by the Rockefeller Foundation. This concept is older than you want to even know. You people better get off your butts and educate yourself, and get out of denial, and instead of blasting it as conspiracy theory and wake up in a socialist country, get active.


http://www.illuminati-news.com/rock_and_mc.htm


"Communism and Socialism all know that they can not survive with strong families. Strong families make strong communities, and strong communities keep government power in check. Break down the families, and the door is wide open to centralizing power in government. Once families break down through divorce, welfare, cohabitation, etc. government gets more and more involved in everyday life. More and more centralized government control.


"Destroy the family," as Lenin said, "and you destroy society." Thereby he merely repeated what Socrates had said before and what Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx put into words. Lenin set out to do just that, hoping that a new society -- with the State as the ultimate father -- could be constructed.


http://nodnc.com/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=2



If anyone wants the details of this incredible conspiracy it is available. Many will remain the frog boiling in the water even if they have 20+ years as intelligence service, Military, government, scientists.....have not one clue about this conspiracy and will end up in the boiling water when we need your influence and knowledge in this truth. People blast the "so called conspiracy theorist" without ever checking it out. Traitors like Ron Paul and Alex Jones who pretend to be on our side have many fooled.....and so we just maintain our HERO WORSHIP without questioning their real loyalities.

Sent to:

The White House Is Not Going After Fox

911 Propaganda Billboard - July, 2005
Originally uploaded by Antifluff Superstar

Talk about being overly sensitive. The White House says something about a news organizations practices and they all start whining. Fox is heavy on opinion and light on facts. They created promoted two events all the while claiming they were spontaneous events that they had nothing do with.

Amazingly the news org's can ignore the people who voted for change and listen to fox declare that this is not it. We voted for change because of all the 101 dangerous Academics talk. And if you don't think the invasion of Iraq was right then you hate America stance.

The new message from the white house is simply We have had eight plus years of certain people making a big mess out of our country. Instead screaming about nonexistent death panels, and birth certificates called certificates of live birth. And fascism and socialism. And claims that the Nazis wanted to help get people health insurance. The White House is saying you see this mess. Don't just stand there over to the side complaining, grab a mop.

Strangely enough the other media outlets 'sides MSNBC. Have some how missed the fact that fox seems to be totally on the side of the people against what needs to be done. People who directly benefit from things that voters called for to be changed. And if you read the polls the wrong way. You don't see that Obama's support numbers are slipping because people are losing confidence in seeing change. But the media says its the change itself. Even though that change is yet to come and and is being rather vigorously blocked. And many distractions are being thrown up to try and keep it from ever happening...

Us sixty something millions who voted for change are who this message is to. To show us they are still on track and listening to us whine.The distraction that fox is, is nothing to us. It's that after eight plus years we put up with. We need to hear shenanigans called on their crap.

Sarah For Dinner

$25,000 plus. ...or Lobster Thermidor a Crevette with a mornay sauce served in a Provencale manner with shallots and aubergines garnished with truffle pate, brandy and with a fried egg on top and spam.

If Hilary Drops Out

First there is no dropping out now. What they are doing is giving her an out to avoid facing defeat. And the only graceful way for her to go is to apologize for all the race baiting, for the gas tax, talking in that silly twang. And let's not forget blaming Obama for being the aggressor when we all know the green man don't got what it takes to be like that. Which the MSM made note of over and over again but some how forgot when camp Clinton made the claims. If she drops pout now she doesn't have to deal with the mess she has made for herself.

If she can show that she can be a big now it would do a lot of good. As the progressive say ( actually say ) its time for the grown ups to be back in charge. She has said a lot of things just to get votes that she should be ashamed of. Her pandering really hurt her character badly. And despite an offer for Governor or Senate leader to get her to stop. First she and everyone needs to own up to what she did then begin to mend fences.

Lieberman Will...

Caucus with the Democrats like he said he would. After trying to he will then become frustrated and side with the people helped him get re-elected. He owes them. They gave him money and supported him. Him on meet the press.

Partisan and moderate. Ones an accusation used by people who said the other side was not just wrong they were wrong for America and maybe siding with the terrorist. The other is claim used to say that even with all the accusing of the other side of being the extreme ones. They got elected by not being everything they was accused of being.

What a big conservative win 11/7/06 was. Which by they way will be the out for Lieberman. There is no way things are going to stay the same with a small group of people claiming to have all the plans. And should just hold on and believe in them to be doing the right thing. And that they not only don't need any oversight. They are more than a little upset by your not trusting their secret decisions. And when they start to squawking he run to, run in place more like, their side of the isle.

BushCo. Will The Investigations Begin Overseas?

Is the reason behind Rumsfeld leaving a lawsuit by Germany? A story by Adam Zagorin at TIME.com makes me think so.

Just days after his resignation, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is about to face more repercussions for his involvement in the troubled wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. New legal documents, to be filed next week with Germany's top prosecutor, will seek a criminal investigation and prosecution of Rumsfeld, along with Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, former CIA director George Tenet and other senior U.S. civilian and military officers, for their alleged roles in abuses committed at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison and at the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

War War War War

Peace is an option for the weak.

Fighting for peace does not mean war. Fighting for peace does not mean wearing tie dye and chanting in the streets.

Fighting for peace means all the people at BushCo. who are at war with Islam have to silenced. And then we need to restart the Middle East Peace process.

It's a horrible example but it's there. If you let them lose they will kill hundreds of thousands of people with no end in sight. They will use the fact that deaths have happened during their war as a reason to continue their war. And if you are against their war then you are weak. Iraq did not attack the United States Iraq could not attack the United States.

But just the same they say their war is going smoothly. It just that you don't understand that it's very complicated and you need to back off. BTW if the media and the politicians back off any farther they'd be on another planet.

Is all military action bad? No! Something really has to be done about Darfur and now.

Will the Democrats start building committees and boards of experts and start discussing peace in the Middle East which include trying to stabilize Iraq? Or will they listen to the "xerox media enabling lapdogs" and behave themselves in a niceties rich bipartisan way?

Just because they called unpatriotic and connected you with a child sex club, nambla. That would be no reason to misbehave now would my little defeatocrats.

Two Things About That Election Thingy

Ok first off the DNC DCCC and the DSCC need to get the fuck together or shut the fuck up. Now they're playing the blame game over whose strategy worked best and whose cost the Dem's an un-vetoable majority.

I'd say it was whomever decided not to go with cable channel advertising and who let the Repub's get away with setting the tone i.e. The Death Tax, John Kerry's bad joke telling e.t.c. They are a little to hung up on appearance rather than substance. That's why most of these people didn't stick up for Kerry in 2004. This not about coming to power it is about right and wrong. And there is a hell of a lot of wrong to be dealt with.

And ain't it funny that Jim Webb wins because the Repub's didn't want the electronic voting machines with the paper trail? Notice how they don't want Allen to contest the results.

Dog Bites Man

Lieberschnauzer goes on fox and starts biting at all the foolish Dem's who supported him. Thank goodness they didn't take away his seniority when he chose to stay in the race after loosing the primary. And thank goodness none of the Democrat bigwigs gave their full support to Ned Lamont.

I say blame the Clinton's for this mess...

IL-Gov MSI Scandal, What MSI Scandal...?

Judy Baar Topinka wants ex Gov. Jim Edgar to head up her transitional team if she is elected. Not even trying to hide the fact that if you let a republican back in the Governors mansion it will be back to full blown corruption. What player Blagojevich did, and damn him for being one, will be nothing compared to the mess republicans will make of our state.